Legal Opinion

De Loatch v. Beamon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1960No. 737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Judge Carr, in entering final judgment, treated defendants’ prayer that, the action be dismissed as a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The rules applicable upon consideration of such motion are fully stated in Erickson v. Starling, 235 N.C. 643, 71 S.E. 2d 384. Suffice to say, we are in agreement with Judge Carr’s ruling that the pleadings do not raise an issue of fact as to any material matter. The question arising thereon is a question of law, namely, whether the proposed expenditures are “necessary expenses” within the terms of Article VII, Section 7, of the Constitution of North 9…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Fawcett v. Town of Mt. AirySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Jones v. Commissioners.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Board of Trustees v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Craig v. County of ChathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Harris v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Harris v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WASHINGTON COUNTYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API