Nadeau v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Washington county to determine a boundary line. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Stolberg, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant Andrew W. Johnson for his costs and disbursements. Erom the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Action to determine the boundary line of certain real property in which defendants had judgment and plaintiff appealed.
The facts in brief are as follows: Block 25 of Forest Lake Village ■contains, according to the plat thereof, four lots; 1, 2, and 3 of *366which, as so platted, are 50 and lot four 60 feet wide. In the year 1902 plaintiff was 'the owner of all these lots, and he sold and. conveyed lot 3 to Johnson & Hurd, a copartnership composed of defendant Johnson and one Hurd. Plaintiff had theretofore erected a store building upon lot 4 which he occupied in the conduct of his. mercantile…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Benz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fishman v. NielsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- County of Houston v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Lenzmeier v. EssSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Einung v. SchlopkohlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Slindee v. Fritch Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009