Legal Opinion

Einung v. Schlopkohl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1915No. Nos. 19,054-(259)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the district court for Pipestone county to determine a boundary line. The case was tried before Nelson, J., who made the findings set ont in the opinion. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Per curiam

This action involves the boundary line between the land of the respective parties, and the question here presented is whether the evidence supports the findings of the trial court to the effect that there was heretofore a practical location of such line by the owners of the land adjoining thereon. The court found that prior to the year 1890 the owners of the adjoining land caused a survey thereof to be made for the purpose of locating and establishing the true boundary line between their separate tracts of land; that the line was thus located; that a fence was constructed thereon, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Benz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. County of Houston v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Nadeau v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fishman v. NielsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. State v. BoykinIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API