Legal Opinion

Berry Dry Goods Co. v. Ward

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1926No. 17204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

Among the several questions presented by this appeal, one involves the correctness of the court’s ruling in sustaining a general demurrer to the petition on the part of some of the defendants, and sustaining a motion for judgment on the pleadings filed Dy the other defendants.

The amended petition charges that J. L. Ward was indebted to the Berry Dry Goods Company, and assigned a note and real estate mortgage executed to him by Henry J. and Mary E. Ward, to the Berry Dry Goods Company as collateral security for the indebtedness. The( Dry Goods Company further alleged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. GassertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Venmex Oil Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Nordman v. School District No. 43Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Foster v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Ray v. Oklahoma Furn. Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API