Legal Opinion
Seligman v. Belknap
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 28, 1941PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner—
Reversing’.
The case involves the interpretation of the city and regional planning and zoning statute pertaining to cities ■of the first class. Section 30'37h-lll et seq., Statutes, ■Chapter 86, Acts of 1930. The City of Louisville has adopted a series of ordinances in accord therewith. Gen. Ordinances, 1939 Compilation, No. 454 et seq. These include a major street plan proposed by the City .Planning and Zoning Commission (No. 468) and regulations to govern subdivisions in harmony therewith, No. •469. A separate ordinance deals with zoning, No. 470.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Mansfield & Swett, Inc. v. Town of West OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- City of Elizabeth v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- A. L. Carrithers & Son v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Smith v. SelligmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shelton v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Roberson v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Marx v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- SAMMAMISH COUNCIL v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- City of Carlsbad v. CavinessNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.