People v. Love
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The courts below did not err in determining that the police officers’ entrance into the hotel room was the result of a reasonably perceived emergency excusing the warrant requirement and that, consequently, their observation and seizure of the contraband in plain view was lawful (see, People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173, 177-178, cert denied 426 US 953). The nature and specificity of the police radio transmissions, their close temporal proximity, the reputation of the hotel as a locale for drug and prostitution…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. LigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. DwyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.