Legal Opinion

(PC) Stone v. Jane Doe

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 3, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00191Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 NICHOLAS SCOTT STONE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00191-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 11 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 12 RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION JANE DOE, et al., BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR 13 FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. 14 (ECF No. 9) 15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 16 17 Plaintiff Nicholas Scott Stone is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As amended, Plaintiff’s 19…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API