Legal Opinion
Hetland v. Hirsch
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 26, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00487Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Tobias Hetland, No. CV-21-00487-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Patrick Hirsch, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Tobias Hetland filed a Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees pursuant to 16 LRCiv 54.2(b)(2) and 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). (Doc. 14 at 1, Doc. 14-5). The Court grants the 17 motion. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 The Court previously set forth the factual background of this case. (See Doc. 12.) 20 As relevant here, from approximately April 2020 through February 2021, Hetland worked 21 for the Outlaw…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.