Legal Opinion

United States v. Rivers

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 9, 1990No. Crim. S 89-0396PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SMALKIN, District Judge.

This criminal case is pending on the defendant’s motion for a factual determination of career offender status. No ore tenus hearing is necessary.

The defendant is pending sentencing on a bank robbery charge. In compiling the pre-sentence report, the probation officer identified two prior offenses that would seemingly qualify the defendant for career offender status pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guideline § 4B1.1. There is no dispute that these two prior convictions are valid convictions that involve crimes of violence. The only question is whether they…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Abraham Rodriguez FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gregory Robert RiversCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Paul ChartierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Pamela M. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. William Francis BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Marvin Jesse ManuelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API