Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 16, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Harlan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of ti-ie Court by

Judge Nunn

Reversing.

Elijah Fields, Narcissus Middleton and Robert Middleton brought this action against appellants for the purpose of having about 100 acres of land which belonged to Wm. Middleton in his lifetime, divided among them. One Turner patented the land and sold and conveyed to Walter Middleton, his son-in-law,, for life, and at his death it was to go to Ms children, who were thirteen in number at the time of his death. Walter Middleton, however, sold the land to Wm. Middleton and made him 'an absolute conveyance. Wm. Middleton was a son of Walter, and lie…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. May v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Sullivan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Burchett v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Mastin v. Mastin's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Grieb v. Jefferson County Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API