Legal Opinion

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 2010No. 2D07-3392PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRENSHAW, Judge.

Andre Bryant appeals his judgment and sentence for robbery with a firearm or deadly weapon in violation of section 812.13(1) and (2)(a), Florida Statutes (2006). We affirm his judgment and sentence without comment on all but one of the issues he raised on appeal. However, we write to address Bryant’s contention that the trial court fundamentally erred by providing jury instructions that contained the conjunction “and/or” between the names of the alleged victims. For reasons stated below, we find the use of the conjunction “and/or” in the jury instructions in this case…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Delgado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Juarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Nicholson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Schepman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API