Legal Opinion

In Re: Fought

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 4, 2019No. 19-1127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: DAVID FOUGHT, MARTIN CLANTON, Appellants ______________________ 2019-1127 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/507,528. ______________________ Decided: November 4, 2019 ______________________ RYAN MATTHEW FOUNTAIN, Mishawaka, IN, argued for appellants. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS L.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. coolsavings.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Bell Communications Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Bicon, Inc v. The Straumann CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simo Holdings Inc. v. Hong Kong Ucloudlink NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  2. Hall v. CullinanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
  3. MOSKOWITZ FAMILY LLC v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Sentient Sensors, LLC v. Cypress Semiconductor CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API