Legal Opinion · Dissent

CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC. v. King

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 2009No. 06-AA-1003Published

1DissentOberly, Associate Judge

I write separately to explain why I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc.

Patricia King, a hearing-impaired janitorial worker, voluntarily quit her job in the eighth month of a high-risk pregnancy that had already caused her to exhaust her entire 16 weeks of statutory Family Medical Leave, pursuant to a medically-approved absence, by the sixth month of her pregnancy. The Office of Administrative Hearings affirmed a claims examiner’s award to King of unemployment benefits pursuant to D.C.Code. § 51-110(a) (2006), finding that she left her job “for good cause connected with the work.”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of LaborDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Bublis v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Chimes District of Columbia, Inc. v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API