Legal Opinion
Rintoul v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided August 24, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions
At Law.
1Opinion of the CourtShipjian, J.
This is an action at law, which was tried by the court upon an agreed statement of facts, a trial by jury having been waived, by written stipulation of the parties. The facts which were agreed-by the parties, and which were found by the court to he true, are as follows:
*906“The following facts.are agreed upon for the purposes of the trial of the above-entitled action:
“(1) The plaintiffs are partners in business at Glasgow, Scotland, under the Arm name of P. Rintoul & Sons, and are citizens and residents of Great Britain.
“ (2) The defendants are a corporation formed pursuant to the laws of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Transportation Company v. DownerSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Mercantile Mutual Insurance Company v. . CalebsNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson Co. v. Boylston Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. KemptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- Providence Washington Ins. v. The SydneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
- Providence Washington Insurance v. The SidneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
- Olivier Produce Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927