Legal Opinion
BROOKS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 31, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00566Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE SHATEMA B., ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 1:19-cv-00566-NT ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION On Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, Defendant, the Social Security Administration Commissioner, found that Plaintiff has severe impairments, but retains the functional capacity to perform substantial gainful activity. Defendant, therefore, denied Plaintiff’s request for disability benefits. Plaintiff filed this action to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Victoria MANSO-PIZARRO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Nicasio RODRIGUEZ PAGAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.