Buckman v. Hatch
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1DissentAngellotti, J.
I dissent. I am of the opinion that the allegation as to the resolution of intention is sufficient in the absence of a special demurrer. While it is essential, under the decisions of this court, that the resolution of intention should state what materials are to be used in the proposed work, it has never been held, so far as I am advised, that the complaint in an ■ action to foreclose the assessment lien must describe the work with the same degree of exactness. If, however, it affirmatively appears from the' complaint' that the resolution of intention did not so specify the materials; and,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bituminous Lime Rock Paving & Improvement Co. v. FultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893