Legal Opinion

Bituminous Lime Rock Paving & Improvement Co. v. Fulton

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1893No. 14,907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; Walter Van Dyke, Judge. Action by the Bituminous Lime Rock Paving and Improvement Company against J. E. Fulton and others to enforce a lien for street assessments. There was a judgment in favor of defendant Henderson, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

The plaintiff in this cause appeals from a final judgment entered in favor of defendants. The action was instituted in the superior court in and for the county of Los Angeles to enforce a lien against certain property of the defendants, described in the complaint, which lien w,as created by an assessment made by the street superintendent of the city of Los Angeles, to obtain payment for certain work done under an act entitled “An act to provide for work upon streets,” etc., “within municipalities,” .approved March 18, 1885, as amended March 14, 1889, and known and designated as the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Los Angeles v. WaldronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stoner v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Bentley v. Interior Milling Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Drew v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Buckman v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Buckman v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API