Legal Opinion
Eatherly v. Oregon State Correctional Institution
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 12, 1976No. 277, CA 4394PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
A new position entitled ombudsman was created at the Oregon State Correctional Institution. In accordance with the Oregon merit system law, ORS ch 240, procedures were instituted by the Corrections Division of the Department of Human Resources to fill the position, which was classified as Administrative Assistant 3 (Ombudsman). Petitioner was one of eight successful applicants who passed the test administered by the Corrections Division with the approval of the Personnel Division of the Executive Department. The list, after certain rating procedures were completed, was narrowed to three, from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sloat v. Board of Examiners of the Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Civil Service Board of City of Phoenix v. WarrenArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Ziomek v. BartimoleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Firshein v. ReavyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Matter of Firshein v. ReavyNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paul v. Personnel DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977