Legal Opinion

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Steel Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 16, 1984No. Civ. A. Nos. 83-143, 83-148, 83-547, 83-801 and 84-79 MMSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff El Paso Products Company (“El Paso”) initiated a declaratory judgment action against Phillips Petroleum Company (“Phillips”) challenging the validity of a Phillips patent. After accepting a license, El Paso moved to “Retain Royalties Pendente Lite.” The motion requests this Court to issue an order determining that:(a) All royalty payments due Phillips Petroleum Company (“Phillips”) pursuant to the License Agreement under the ’851 patent entered into between defendant Phillips and El Paso may be retained in escrow by El Paso pendente lite;(b)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. S. J. Stile Associates Ltd. v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. Milton Roy Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  5. Usm Corporation v. Standard Pressed Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API