Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Fulmer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1952No. 28,840PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

Jasper, J.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss appellant’s appeal. Appellant appealed, under §3-2603, Burns’ 1946 Replacement, from the decision of the trial court appointing a receiver pendente lite for real estate of appellant.

Appellee, in her motion to dismiss, contends that appellant failed to file her transcript within the time provided by statute. Section 3-2603, Burns’ 1946 Replacement, provides as follows:

“In all cases hereafter commenced or now pending in any of the courts of this state, in which a receiver may be appointed or refused, the party aggrieved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Gross Income Tax Division v. W. B. Conkey Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. McConnell v. FulmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. HABERKORN v. DeKalb Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Nineteenth Hole, Inc. v. Marion Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. F. McConnell & Sons, Inc. v. Target Data Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  4. English v. StamperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. Johnson, Admrx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API