Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Nineteenth Hole, Inc. v. Marion Superior Court
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1963No. 30,296PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
— The relator has filed a petition for a writ of prohibition against the. respondent court, asking that the court be prohibited from proceeding with the appointment without notice of a receiver for relator Corporation. We issued a temporary writ.
The facts, according to the record, show that a complaint “For Accounting and Appointment of Receiver for Corporate Defendant” was filed on June 25, 1962. A summons was issued on the same date. There was also filed on that date an “Affidavit for the Appointment of a Receiver without Notice.” On that date the respondent court appointed Nicholas W.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Indianapolis v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- State ex rel. Harkness v. GleasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- State Ex Rel. Durham v. Marion Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Red Dragon Diner, Inc. v. Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- State Etc. v. Marion Cir. Ct. Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- STATE EX REL. HABERKORN v. DeKalb Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Gibson General Hospital v. Warrick Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
- Snider v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Bicanic v. Lake Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Rainey v. Board of TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.