Legal Opinion

Graeber v. Hewlett Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 16, 2006No. C 05-01124 CRBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BREYER, District Judge.

This ERISA lawsuit challenges the termination of plaintiffs long-term disability benefits.

BACKGROUND

A. The ERISA Plan

This is a dispute about coverage under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Disability Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides that

[t]he Company is the named fiduciary which has the discretionary authority to act with respect to any appeal from a denial of benefits. The Company’s discretionary authority includes the authority to determine eligibility for benefits and to construe the terms of the Plan. The Claims Administrator shall administer…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Mary Anne Bendixen v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karen McClain v. Eaton Corp. Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Arnold v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
  3. Kevin Wilcox v. Dearborn Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API