Legal Opinion

Riverside Roof Truss v. Board of Zoning

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 28, 1999No. 99-95PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

734 So.2d 1139 (1999)

RIVERSIDE ROOF TRUSS, INC., and Sidney E. Oberman, Petitioners,

v.

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF the CITY OF PALATKA, Florida, Nextel Corporation South and Smith Products Company, Inc., Respondents.

No. 99-95.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 28, 1999.

Michael W. Woodward of Keyser & Woodward, P.A., Interlachen, for Petitioners.

James L. Padgett of Padgett & Morris, P.A., Crescent City, for Respondent, Board of Zoning Appeals.

Robert D. Gatton of Broad & Cassel, P.A., Orlando, for Respondents, Nextel Corporation South and Smith Products Company, Inc.

THOMPSON,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. At & T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. v. Orange CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
  3. At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of AdjustmentDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1998
  4. Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BellSouth Mobility v. Miami-Dade County, FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API