Legal Opinion
Potter v. Potter
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 26, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Holly J. Potter appeals from a judgment granting a divorce to her and Arnold B. Potter Jr. entered in the District Court (Houlton, O’Mara, J.). Holly contends that the court erred and abused its discretion by (1) limiting the amount and duration of spousal support awarded pursuant to 19-A M.R.S. § 951-A (2006), and (2) making the award of spousal support not subject to future modification. We are unpersuaded by Holly’s contentions as to the amount and duration of the award of spousal support, but because we agree with Holly’s second contention, we amend the judgment to make it subject…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miele v. MieleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Payne v. PayneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Powell v. PowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Fitzpatrick v. FitzpatrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Efstathiou v. Aspinquid, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Molly G. (Lachance) Jandreau v. Daniel L. LachanceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Theberge v. ThebergeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Michael v. Finucan v. Laurel (Finucan) WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Matthew W. Buck v. Lisa H. BuckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.