Legal Opinion
State v. Jackson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 9, 1993No. 10738PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (l),1 sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (l),2 and unlawful restraint in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-96.3 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions and (2) the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the issue of intent with respect to the sexual assault offenses requires a new trial on those charges.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. DeJesusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. RaynorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. BaileyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.