Legal Opinion
Woods v. Donald
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 30, 2015No. 14-618PublishedCited by 979 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as:
575 U. S. ____
(2015) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFFREY WOODS, WARDEN v. CORY DONALD ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 14–618. Decided March 30, 2015 PER CURIAM. Federal courts may grant habeas corpus relief if the underlying state-court decision was “contrary to, or in volved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by” this Court. 28 U. S. C. §2254(d)(1). Here, the Sixth Circuit held that respondent Cory Donald’s attorney provided per se ineffective assis…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by979 opinions
- Brown v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Virginia v. LeBlancSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Johnny L. Marshall v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Morrow v. MeachumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Clinton Folkes v. Warden NelsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
974 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.