Legal Opinion
United States v. Guerrerio
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 8, 1987No. 86 Cr. 1061 (DNE)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
The defendants move for suppression, under the court’s supervisory power, of statements made by defendants Edward Lustig and Robert Guerrerio Jr. to Dominic DeFebo. Defendants assert that suppression is necessary because the Assistant United States Attorney (“AUSA”) assigned to the case violated DR 7-104(A)(l) of the Code of Professional Responsibility as adopted by the New York State Bar Association. As a full statement of the background of this case is set forth in the court’s previous opinion, dated October 13, 1987, United States v. Guerrerio,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Michael Williams v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- State Ex Rel. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MaddenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Papanicolaou v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.