Legal Opinion
Sato v. Hanlon (In re Hanlon)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 15, 2016No. Bankruptcy Case No. 15-64121-tmr7; Adversary Proceeding No. 16-6040-tmrcPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED1
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS M. RENN, Bankruptcy Judge
Plaintiff filed the instant adversary complaint seeking to except a state court judgment from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15).2 The matter before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. After briefing and oral argument, the matter is ripe for decision.
FRCP 12(b)(6) Standards:
Defendant’s motion is brought under FRCP 12(b)(6) (made applicable by FRBP 7012(b)) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Under FRCP 12(b)(6), the court must accept as true all well-pleaded allegations contained in the complaint,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zavacky v. NabongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2019