Legal Opinion
Celauro v. Celauro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 27, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered June 20, 2000, which denied his motion to resettle a judgment of the same court, dated May 10, 2000.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500; Blaustein v Blaustein, 145 AD2d 591; Blume v Blume, 124 AD2d 771). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blaustein v. BlausteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Blume v. BlumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Schanback v. SchanbackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vogelgesang v. VogelgesangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hoeflschweiger v. DecovnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Carrano v. CarranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cohen v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Bradley v. William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022