Legal Opinion
Carrano v. Carrano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see Vogelgesang v Vogelgesang, 71 AD3d 1131 [2010]; Celauro v Celauro, 286 AD2d 471 [2001]; Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500 [1990]; Blaustein v Blaustein, 145 AD2d 591 [1988]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blaustein v. BlausteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Schanback v. SchanbackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Vogelgesang v. VogelgesangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Celauro v. CelauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Evans v. Board of Educ. of Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016