Legal Opinion
United States v. Meyer
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 1972No. Misc. 28-72PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge. *
This case grew out of the trial of the so-called “D.C. Nine,” seven of whom were found guilty in a jury trial before Judge John H. Pratt of this Court. 1 Those convictions were recently reversed and the case against the said seven was remanded for new trial. United States v. Dougherty (D.C. Cir. June 30, 1972). At the conclusion of the trial of the seven, Judge Pratt cited respondent, one of court-appointed defense counsel, for criminal contempt and the next day read to him the following certificate:
pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Bobby G. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re James R. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Horton C. Weiss v. Waldon C. Burr, Sheriff of Pima County, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Doe v. Transylvania UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Horton C. Weiss v. Waldon C. Burr, Sheriff of Pima County, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.