Legal Opinion

Alfred Santini & Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered July 21, 1998, denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing *120the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants dismissing the complaint.

A claim for payment from the Board of Education must be preceded by a notice of claim served on the Board within three months of its accrual (Education Law § 3813 [1]; Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539, 547-548), a condition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Castagna & Son, Inc. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zurich American Insurance v. Ramapo Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. H. Verby Co. v. Carle Place Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Mainline Electric Corp. v. East Quogue Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. James McCullagh Co. v. South Huntington Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Lombardo v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API