Alfred Santini & Co. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered July 21, 1998, denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing *120the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants dismissing the complaint.
A claim for payment from the Board of Education must be preceded by a notice of claim served on the Board within three months of its accrual (Education Law § 3813 [1]; Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539, 547-548), a condition…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Castagna & Son, Inc. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zurich American Insurance v. Ramapo Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- H. Verby Co. v. Carle Place Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mainline Electric Corp. v. East Quogue Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- James McCullagh Co. v. South Huntington Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Lombardo v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.