Pizaño v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Cameron. Tried belo w before the Hon. J. C. Bussell. The conviction in this case, supplemented by a penalty of txvo years in the penitentiary, was for unlawfully branding a calf, not his own, without the consent of, and with the intent to defraud, the owner. The disposition of the case necessitates no statement of the facts proved.
1Opinion of the Court
White, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted in the lower court and given two years in the penitentiary upon a prosecution for illegally branding a calf. A decision of one question will dispose of the case on this appeal. This question .is presented by appellant’s first bill of exceptions, which, after stating the case, is as follows, viz.:
“Be it remembered that upon the trial of this cause the following proceedings were had: On this 23d day of October, 1S85, this cause being regularly reached and duly called for trial, came the State by the district attorney and the defendant in person and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Maden v. EmmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. DolanMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CritelliSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Holt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945