Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1884No. 12,059PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Niblack, J. —

This was a prosecution by indictment against Joseph J. Adams, under section 2204, R. S. 1881, for selling a promissory note to the Citizens Bank of Huntington, at Huntington, Indiana, knowing that one of the signatures to the note had been obtained by false pretences. Upon a former appeal to this court the indictment was held to be sufficient, and the judgment below quashing it was reversed. State v. Adams, 92 Ind. 116.

After the cause was remanded, and issue had been formally joined by the entry of a plea of not guilty, a panel of jurors was called to try it. A man known as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Kingen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Gillooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Maden v. EmmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Henning v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cheadle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Block v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Sides v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API