Legal Opinion

American Rolling Mill Co. v. Leslie

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 10, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

—Affirming.

It is declared in our Workmen’s Compensation statute, KRS 342.025, that three elements must be definitely proved to sustain a claim for compensation for a hernia, namely :

“(a) -There was an injury resulting in hernia;
“(b) The hernia appeared suddenly and immediately following the injury; and
“(c) The hernia did not exist in any degree prior to the injury for which compensation is claimed.”

In the present case it was proved that W. L. Leslie, while at work for the American Rolling Mill Company on July 23, 1944, fell and struck the lower part…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. American Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Furferi v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Mirific Products Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Matthews v. Hardaway Contracting Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sam's Place v. MiddletonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Harvey Coal Corp. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  3. Pattengill v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Owensboro Wagon Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. Hagan v. Mayflower Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API