Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wiggins v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 2016No. A16A0162Published

1ConcurrenceMcFadden, Judge

I fully concur in the majority opinion. I write separately to make clear that the threat to prosecute defense counsel was unwarranted and gravely improper.

Although he had not subpoenaed Jason Blanpied, the prosecutor promised in his opening statement that the jury would hear from Blanpied. Defense counsel had listed Blanpied as a possible witness. See OCGA § 17-16-8. But during the course of the trial, she made the strategic determination that his testimony would most likely be a net detriment to the defense and told him not to come to court. Blanpied apparently returned to his home in Texas,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Medlock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. State v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Byron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API