Legal Opinion

Byron v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 11, 1997No. A97A2208PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Nathaniel Byron, Jr. guilty of armed robbery and aggravated assault. Byron appeals, enumerating 13 errors which he contends require reversal. We disagree and therefore affirm Byron’s convictions.

1. We note initially that Byron, who is represented by counsel on appeal, has violated Court of Appeals Rule 27 (c) (1) in preparing his brief. This rule clearly provides that “[t]he sequence of argument or arguments in the briefs shall follow the order of the enumeration of errors, and shall be numbered accordingly.” Court of Appeals Rule 27 (c) (1). Byron’s arguments are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilbanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. England v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Ridley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API