Brijmohan v. State Farm Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The order directing the parties to arbitrate in this case noted that there was a dispute as to the amount of coverage provided by the uninsured motorist policy under which appellant sought payment. The court concluded that at arbitration the “policy speaks for itself.” During arbitration, however, respondent State Farm Insurance failed to controvert appellant’s statement that the coverage in question was $100,000, and the declarations page reflecting a lower coverage limit was apparently never…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tatibouet v. EllsworthHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Countrywide Insurance v. SawhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Denson v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- In re the Arbitration between Kocsis & New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Nassau Health Care Corp. v. Civil Service Employees Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.