Legal Opinion

Brijmohan v. State Farm Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1998PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The order directing the parties to arbitrate in this case noted that there was a dispute as to the amount of coverage provided by the uninsured motorist policy under which appellant sought payment. The court concluded that at arbitration the “policy speaks for itself.” During arbitration, however, respondent State Farm Insurance failed to controvert appellant’s statement that the coverage in question was $100,000, and the declarations page reflecting a lower coverage limit was apparently never…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tatibouet v. EllsworthHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Countrywide Insurance v. SawhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Denson v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. In re the Arbitration between Kocsis & New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Nassau Health Care Corp. v. Civil Service Employees Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API