Legal Opinion
Pelletier v. Sordoni/Skanska Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 11, 2003No. SC 16743; SC 16747PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
In these two consolidated appeals, the plaintiff, Norman Pelletier, and his wife, Reine Pelletier,1 appeal from the summary judgment of the trial court,2 rendered in favor of the defendants, Sordoni/ Skanska Construction Company (Sordoni) and Professional Services Industries, Inc. (Professional Services).3 *374The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined that neither Sordoni nor Professional Services could be held hable to the plaintiff for alleged negligence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history is relevant to our…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Florida Power and Light Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Epperly v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pelletier v. SordoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Mozeleski v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003