Legal Opinion

FRIENDLY FINANCE CORPORATION v. Quinn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1950No. 98PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHILL, J.

At common law a conditional sale contract is valid and effective even as against creditors and bona fide purchasers for value from the conditional vendee. Under the reservation of title in the vendor, no assignable title vests in the conditional vendee. 47 A.J. 42, 43, 110. Instead, it vests absolute title in the vendor and he is entitled to recover in replevin or trover from any purchaser from the vendee or other person in possession, Dunbar v. Bawles, 28 Ind. 225, and, under the rule of comity recognized by most states, the contract is enforceable in any state in which the property may be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Dunbar v. RawlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Scholtens v. ScholtensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Scottsbluff v. BearNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Franklin National Bank v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Chetopa State Bank v. ManesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. National Bank of Alaska v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API