Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. State

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 15, 1977PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The plaintiff was convicted of a violation of General Statutes §§ 19-480 (a) and 19-452 in selling a cannabis-type drug. Upon appeal that conviction was sustained. State v. Lombardo, 163 Conn. 241, 304 A.2d 36. Lombardo petitioned for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The trial court rendered judgment denying the petition and from that judgment this appeal has been taken.

At the trial in which Lombardo was convicted, two undercover agents testified that they purchased four kilos of marihuana from the defendant. The defendant denied the charges, and offered in his defense…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. Taborsky v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  5. State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Asherman v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Skakel v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. State v. TutsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API