Shabazz v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal1 is whether the trial court, in deciding this petition for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, properly engaged in a credibility assessment of the proffered newly discovered evidence in order to determine whether it was likely to produce a different result in the event of a new trial. The petitioner, Abdullah Shabazz, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for a new trial following his conviction for murder. *813The petitioner claims that the trial court improperly engaged in a credibility assessment of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People v. . ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. RitrovatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Skakel v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. DupigneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.