Legal Opinion

Seal on Township Bonds

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided December 5, 1922Published

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, Dep. Att’y-Gen.,

Your letter of Nov. 23rd, relative to the purchase of $15,000 of Pike Township, Clearfield County, Pennsylvania, road bonds, the said bonds having no seal attached to them, has been received. Townships, while not strictly corporations, are quasi-corporations. The statutes confer upon them all the powers they possess, prescribe all the duties, and impose all liabilities to which they are subject; being such quasi-municipal corporations, they must act in a corporate way: Shronk v. Penn Township, 3 Rawle, 347; Union Township v. Gibboney, 94 Pa. 534.

One of the powers of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bernards Township v. StebbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Union Township v. Gibboney & NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  3. Draper v. SpringportSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Shronk v. SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API