Legal Opinion
Brasport, S.A. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 16, 1990No. 88 Civ. 3957 (RLC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Brasport, S.A. (“Brasport”), is an Argentine corporation with its principal place of business in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Brasport was incorporated on November 16, 1982, as a wholly-owned subsidiary corporation of Comexport, a Brazilian corporation with its principal place of business in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Arthur Goldlust is Chairman of the Board of Comexport and a member of the Board of Directors of Bras-port.
*200Defendant Hoechst Celanese Corporation, formerly Celanese, is a Delaware Corporation with its principal of business in New Jersey.
Defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Coolite Corp. v. American Cyanamid Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Hutzler v. Hertz Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rodgers v. Roulette Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Goodstein Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New York Pepsi-Cola Distributors Ass'n v. Pepsico, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Brasport, S.A. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991