Legal Opinion
Goodstein Construction Corp. v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1986PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs (see, 111 AD2d 49). The certified question is answered in the affirmative.
Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion to dismiss plaintiffs first and second causes of action sounding in contract. The motion is based solely on CPLR 3211 (a) (7), failure to state a cause of action.
Plaintiffs complaint alleges that defendant, acting through its Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), after considering its response to the city’s request for proposals, entered into designation…
2Cited by28 opinions
- Arcadian Phosphates, Inc., Judas Azuelos, and Eli Sivan v. Arcadian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Readco, Inc., R.D.P. Associates, Lan Associates Xii and Antonio Reale v. Marine Midland Bank Eagle Rock Holding, Inc., a New York Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Goodstein Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Walentas v. LipperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.