Legal Opinion

Sylvester v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 9, 2017No. CR-16-970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaren R. Baker, Associate Justice

11 Appellant Ardwin Sylvester appeals from the denial of his pro se petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 37.1(2016) of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. On appeal, Sylvester raises three grounds to reverse the trial court’s order: his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call his mother, Wanda Mata, as a mitigation witness to provide testimony describing his history of being sexually assaulted as a child and his history of mental illness; his trial counsel failed to obtain copies of a DNA report that was inconclusive in linking Sylvester to the crime; and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Noel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Springs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Munnerlyn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Denzell Braud v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022
  3. TERRANCE PROCTOR v. WENDY KELLEYSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Matthew Ryan Elliott v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022
  5. John Patrick Cullen v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API