Legal Opinion

Butler v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1923No. 14318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “There are many decisions” of the Supreme Court “to the effect that a brief of the evidence is an indispensable statutory requisite to a valid motion for new trial. In other words, if there is no brief of evidence, no motion for new trial exists.” Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (1), 140 (75 S. E. 254); Civil Code (1910), §§ 6080, 6306.

2. The brief required is a brief of the evidence adduced upon the trial, upon which is predicated the verdict complained of, and not merely a brief of the evidence introduced upon a motion of one of the parties for a continuance.

3. The bill of exceptions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Whitaker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Thompson v. Simmons & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Mize v. Americus Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Jill Brothers Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API