Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Umbel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1946No. Appeal, 109PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Plaintiff, a policeman of Uniontown, a city of the third class, filed this bill on behalf of himself and other policemen of the city for a decree declaring a city ordinance of December 16, 1938, null and void and for gen eral relief. The defendants are the City of Uniontown, the Mayor and the four councilmen of the city, and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, doing business in Pennsylvania. The bill was dismissed. Plaintiff appealed.

The purpose of the suit was to set aside the ordinance and a retirement annuity contract made with defendant insurance company…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. HOFFMAN v. PITTSBURGHSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. ShaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Appeal of LonzettaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API