Legal Opinion
Clara Rudick, Now Clara Rosenberg v. Prineville Memorial Hospital, Denison M. Thomas, M.D., and Charles E. Donley, M.D.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1963No. 18199_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This is a diversity action for malpractice against a hospital and two doctors. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. One doctor (Thomas) was a general practitioner; one (Donley)' was an expert in radiology and roentgenology.
Plaintiff below was denied recovery as to either individual defendant, and this-appeal follows. 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because of the unusual method pursued by appellant’s counsel in presenting his legal questions in this case, a fairly extensive resume of the testimony, and more particularly the expert medical testimony presented, is essential to an understanding of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bucy v. Nevada Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Johnston v. ReilyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Fowler v. Crown-Zellerbach CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Peggy Ray Walker Kingston v. M. S. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Beadle v. PaineOregon Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- El Ranco, Inc. v. First National Bank of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Merriman v. ToothakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Barton v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Philippine National Oil Co. v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- El Ranco, Inc. v. The First National Bank Of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.