Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Compania Portorafti Commerciale, S.A. & Kaiser International Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 1985No. 85 Civ. 3920-CSHPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
These are cross-motions to compel arbitration and for related relief. Subject matter jurisdiction is founded upon the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
Facts
At the pertinent times petitioner Compania Portorafti Commerciale, S.A. owned the motor vessel CAPTAIN GREGOS. Petitioner chartered the vessel for a voyage to respondent Kaiser International Corporation. The written charter party was dated November 19, 1984. Clause 24 provided for arbitration of disputes. It reads in pertinent part as follows:
“24. ARBITRATION. Any and all…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- International Produce, Inc., and Cross-Respondent-Appellee v. A/s Rosshavet, Owners of the S.S. Ross Isle, and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- In Re Utility Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- In Re the Arbitration Between Lobo & Co. & Plymouth Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Orion Shipping & Trading Co., Inc. v. Eastern States Petroleum Corporation Of Panama, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
3Cited by10 opinions
- Universal Reinsurance Corporation v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- General Motors Corp. v. Pamela Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- New England Reinsurance Corp. v. Tennessee InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lexington Insurance Co. & Chartis v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.